Linguistic and cultural commentary on onyms as a way of forming the linguistic and socio-cultural competence of non-native learners

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2022-1(3)-53-62

Keywords:

onym, linguoculturological commentary, regional communicative competence

Abstract

The article discusses the method of linguoculturological commenting on proper names in the process of forming the linguistic and socio-cultural competence of foreign students. The purpose of the study is to consider the stages and features of the compilation of educational texts that will contribute to the solution of two tasks at once – linguistic education and socio-cultural adaptation of non-native learners to living conditions in a new region. In the article, the author describes the features of linguoculturological commenting on an onym, which is based on its semantic analysis. This analysis reveals the components of both the core of the structure of meaning (denotation, referent, signifier) and the periphery which includes cultural-historical, communicative-situational and emotional-evaluative components. At the same time, the author emphasizes that the linguistic and cultural description cannot become an object of study in the classroom: working with non-native learners requires simplification of syntactic constructions, selection of lexical units that correspond to the level of students' language proficiency, the use of in-text explanations. According to the author, the main conditions for the selection of vocabulary for linguistic and cultural description in the process of forming linguistic competence are considering the relevance of the proper name and the methodological expediency of its use at a specific stage of teaching Russian as a foreign language. As an example, the article presents two educational texts – about the Trinity Cathedral, the main attraction of Pskov, and about the life of A. S. Pushkin in the village of Mikhailovsky.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

L. S. Golovina, Pskov State University, Pskov, Russian Federation

Candidate of Philological Sciences
E-mail: golovinapsk@yandex.ru

 

References

Abramova, M. V., & Golovina L. S. (2018). Formation of speech culture of foreign students using regional material. Velikiye Luki: Velikolukskaya tipografiya. (In Russian)

Alefirenko, N. F. (2010). Linguoculturology: the valuesemantic space of language. Moscow: Flint: Nauka. (In Russian)

Balykhina, T. M. (2007). Methods of teaching Russian as a non-native (new) language. Moscow: RUDN. (In Russian)

Berezovich, E. L. (2007). Language and traditional culture: Ethnolinguistic studies. Moscow: Indrik. (In Russian)

Bubnova, N. V. (2018). Precedent Smolensk anthroponyms as part of the national background knowledge. Yazyk i kultura, 44, 6–28. (In Russian)

Dominova, T. N. (2012). Linguistic competence of foreign students. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki, 3, 51–55. (In Russian)

Galskova, N. D. (2006). Theory of teaching foreign languages. Linguodidactics and methodology. Moscow: Academiya. (In Russian)

Hrolenko, A. T. (2009). Fundamentals of linguoculturology. Moscow: Flint. (In Russian)

Kryukova, I. V. (2011). Onym pragmatics: research directions and methods of analysis. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 8, 139–143. (In Russian)

Maslova, V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology. Moscow: Academiya. (In Russian)

Nasyrova, A. A. (2013). Formation of a regionally-oriented communicative competence of a Bachelor of Linguistics. Kliningrad: Baltijskij federalnyj universitet im. I. Kanta. (In Russian)

Razhina, V. A. (2007). Onomastic realities: linguoculturological and pragmatic aspects. Krasnodar: KSU. (In Russian)

Ruth, M. E. (2001). Anthroponyms: Reflections on semantics. Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 20, 176–182. (In Russian)

Sklyarevskaya, G. N. (1997). On the question of pragmatic information in explanatory dictionaries: are pragmatic marks possible? Linguistic pragmatics in the dictionary. Types of implementation and methods of description: collection of articles. St. Petersburg, pp. 6–13. (In Russian)

Suprun, V. I. (2000). The onomastic field of the Russian language and its artistic and aesthetic potential. Volgograd: VSPU. (In Russian)

Vasilyeva, O. A. (2020). Characteristics of onomastic units of the "TV zoonyms" subzone as part of the onomastic field with the "pig" hyperseme. Povolzhskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 8, (1), 41–47. (In Russian)

Vereshchagin, E. M., Kostomarov, V. G. (2005). Language and culture. Three linguistic and cultural concepts: lexical background, speech-behavioral tactics and sapientems. Moscow: Indrik. (In Russian)

Vetchinova, M. N., Petrova, V. A. (2021). Theoretical aspects of the formation of communicative competence of university students within the competence approach. Language and culture, 53, 145–161. (In Russian)

Vyatyutnev, M. N. (1986). Traditions and innovations in modern methods of teaching Russian language and literature: Reports of the Soviet delegation at the MAPRYAL Congress. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk, 79–84. (In Russian)

Published

2022-06-20

How to Cite

Golovina Л. С. . (2022). Linguistic and cultural commentary on onyms as a way of forming the linguistic and socio-cultural competence of non-native learners. Verba, (1 (3), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2022-1(3)-53-62