The dynamics of the permeability of one's own and another's word in text and intertext

Abstract

The article deals with the phenomenon of permeability and isolation of the speech autonomies of text and intertext, reveals the universal sides of the interference of someone else's and one's own word in a literary text. On the example of the works of the 20th and 21st centuries, it is investigated how the concept of the work and the linguistic ways of presenting the permeability of one's own and another's word are connected. The patterns of language functioning in the texts of M. Bulgakov, L. Petrushevskaya, E. Vodolazkin are compared. The central question is what determines the dynamics of the permeability of one's own and other people's speech in the texts of these authors and what means of linguistic analysis provide the basis for interpreting this phenomenon. In a work of fiction, the interpretation of the tendency towards the permeability of one's own and another's word is described based on the types of interpretive meanings (pragmatic, referential and receptive). The article shows how these general types of meanings are concretized in specific conditions of the context, literary movement, author's poetics. It is investigated how intratextual realities and intertext participate in a single process of exchanging words and subordinating the ways of permeability of one's own and other people's speech to artistic tasks. In the study of intratextual processes of interference, the works of E. Vodolazkin and L. Petrushevskaya are compared, and the conceptual polarity of the ways of organizing speech autonomies in their texts is revealed. Particular attention is paid to the dynamics of the permeability of one's own and another's word in the intertext: the processes of mutual permeability of Gogol's and Bulgakov's text nominations are considered, and the ways of presenting the varieties of intertext comments that Bulgakov's text needs to be understood by the modern reader are proposed.