Innovations in the field of evaluation: semantic transformations of neological univerbs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-1(6)-48-60

Keywords:

univerbation, univerb, word formation, lexical semantics, connotation

Abstract

The article discusses the changes in the semantic structure of neological derivatives of nouns formed by the method of univerbation. The main attention is paid to the analysis of semantic transformations occurring in univerbs motivated by high-frequency adjectives in modern Russian. Since the analyzed derivatives in their concrete-subjective meanings go back to stable attributive-substantive word combinations, in this paper the corresponding lexemes are considered as formed by the method of univerbation. At the same time, it is noted that the word-formation status of adjective-based derivatives with an extremely broad meaning is uncertain since they cannot be correlated with a specific ambiguous nomination. It seems that the activation of the process of repeated derivation of univerbs is associated with the unique property of univerbation as a method of word formation, which is the absence of a nominal component of the attributive-substantive word combination in the morphemic structure of the derivative. In the course of analyzing the contexts of the use of univerbs in the National Corpus of the Russian language, two types of semantic changes generated by the repeated implementation of the word-formation model are identified. The first type is the specialization of meaning, which results in the emergence of a new subject lexical-semantic variant, the second one is the appearance of an extremely broad characteristic meaning due to the loss of differential semantic features and a specific denotative attribution. Most of the considered univerbs combine the meanings of a person and an object within one lexeme. The subject or feature value is primary, the person value is secondary. The analyzed processes are considered as a linguistic manifestation of ideological and conceptual changes in vocabulary caused by social changes at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries. Univerbs motivated by "fashionable" adjectives are in demand in the language of mass media and colloquial speech as a means of nomination and evaluation of current realities expressing the values of consumer society including the idea of high social status, commercial use, demonstrative success, etc.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

A. V. Batulina, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor
E-mail: b.av@bk.ru

 

References

Cin'syan, V. (2019). Russian neologisms-univerbs: methods of education, semantics, features of functioning. Saint Petersburg, Svet Publ., 2019. 226. (In Russian).

Dozorova, D. V. (2015) Word-formation models of univerbats in modern Russian. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, 2(2),
392–396. (In Russian).

Ermakova, O. P. (2008). Active processes in vocabulary and semantics. Sovremennyi russkii iazyk: Aktivnye protsessy na rubezhe XX – XXI vekov [Modern Russian language. Active processes at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries]. Moscow: 33–99. (In Russian).

Gvozdeva, E. V. (2018). On the question of the place of univerbes and methods of their description in an explanatoryderivational dictionary. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian philology, 2,
26–33. (In Russian).

Kapanadze, L. A. (1973). Nomination. Russian colloquial speech. Moscow: 403–481. (In Russian).

Konopkina, E. S., & Lunina, T. P. (2021). Truncation as a method of compressive word formation. Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, 2(31), 107–111. (In Russian).

Kopot', L. V., (2008). Univerbs in Russian colloquial speech: structure and semantics: based on the material of the magazine "Za rul'om". Maykop. 62. (In Russian).

Kostomarov, V. G. (1995).The word bespredel and activation of other non-suffix nouns Filologicheskiy sbornik: (k 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. V. Vinogradova) [Philological collection: (on the 100th anniversary of the birth of V. V. Vinogradov)]. Moscow: 254–261. (In Russian).

Krongauz, M. (2018). The Russian language is on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Moscow: AST: CORPUS Publ. 512. (In Russian).

Kubriakova, E. S. (2008). Types of language values. Semantics of a derived word. Moscow, URSS Publ. 198. (In Russian).

Kuznetsov S. A. (Ed.). (1998). The Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. First edition: Saint Petersburg, Norint Publ. Published in the author's edition in 2014. Retrieved from http://www.gramota.ru
(In Russian).

National Corpus of the Russian language. Retrieved from http://www.ruscorpora.ru

Neshchimenko, G. P. (2010). The tendency of language economy as a factor of the dynamics of the literary norm. Novyye yavleniya v slavyanskom slovoobrazovanii: sistema i funktsionirovaniye: doklady XI Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii Komissii po slavyanskomu slovoobrazovaniyu pri Mezhdunarodnom komitete slavistov [New phenomena in Slavic word formation: system and functioning: reports of the 11th International scientific conference of the Commission on Slavic word formation at the International Committee of Slavists]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Philology, March 24–26, Moscow: 116–134.
(In Russian).

Novikov, Vl. (2019). Dictionary of fashionable words. The linguistic picture of modernity. Moscow: Slovar' XXI veka Publ., 252. (In Russian).

Ol'khovskaya, A. I. (2016). Active processes in modern Russian. London: Retrieved from
http://pushkin.institute/news/Olkhovskaya_Active%20processes%20in
%20Russian1.pdf

Osipova, L. I. (2000). New words in the Russian language: feminine suffixal univerbs with the suffix -k-a. Dictionaryreference book on the materials of the press and literature of the 60–90s. Moscow: 230. (In Russian).

Osipova, L. I. (2014). Nouns are univerbs in Russian colloquial speech. Moscow, Moscow City University Publ. 239. (In Russian).

Sen'ko, E. V. (2007). Neologization in modern Russian: an inter-level aspect. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 354. (In Russian).

Shvedova N. Yu. (Ed.). (1980). Russian Grammar: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Phonetics. Phonology. Stress. Intonation. Word formation. Morphology. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 783. (In Russian).

Sklyarevskaya, G. N. (Ed.). (2008). Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language of the beginning of the 21st century. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 1131. (In Russian).

Vinogradov, V. N. (1984). The stylistic aspect of the Russian word formation. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 184. (In Russian).

Vinogradov, V. V. (1972). The Russian language (grammatical teaching about the word): a textbook for students of philological specialties of universities. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ., 613.
(In Russian).

Zemskaya, E. A., (1981). Russian colloquial speech: General questions. Word formation. Syntax. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 276. (In Russian).

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Batulina А. В. (2023). Innovations in the field of evaluation: semantic transformations of neological univerbs. Verba, (1 (6), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-1(6)-48-60