On accommodating structures and more

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-2(7)-50-65

Keywords:

accommodating sentences, syntaxeme, anaphora, staple

Abstract

The grammatical descriptions of Russian relatively extended compound sentences with an accommodating meaning are analysed, their characteristics in the existing literature are specified. The specificity of the syntactic connection in such sentences is considered on the basis of three components – the content of the main part, the relative что and its syntactical position in the subordinate part. It has been found that the syntaxemic connection between these components is multi-layered and asymmetric, and its regulator is the что relative, which serves as a tool, on the one hand, having semantic breadth to accommodate multiple and diverse content, and on the other hand, having grammatical flexibility to embed the contained meaningful volume into the position of any participant in a typical situation, named in the subordinate part. By its anaphoric and accommodating meaning, the relative что is an indicator of the case relation of the predicate unit, i.e. a kind of “inflection” of the main part, to the same extent as the correlative pronoun то acts as an “inflection” of the subordinate part in the accommodating constructions, with the difference that relative что is anaphoric and refers to the already named antecedent, whereas то is cataphoric and its accommodating meaning is directed to the harbinger, the postcedent. For the denotative level of a compound sentence, it is important what syntaxemes the correlative and relative pronouns are, what relations they form and in what combinations they form the staple that connects the parts of a compound sentence together. A part of the inventory of staples in relatively extended sentences is demonstrated and the ways in which they are formed and replenishment in the Russian language are shown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

M. I. Konyushkevich, Independent Researcher, Grodno, Republic of Belarus

Dr. Sci. in Philology, Professor
E-mail: marikon9@mail.ru

 

References

Beloshapkova V. A., Zemskaya E. A., Miloslavsky I. G., Panov M. V. (1981). Modern Russian language. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ. (In Russian).

Beloshapkova, V. A. (1977). Modern Russian. Syntax. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ. (In Russian).

Cheremisina, M. I. (1982). On the Explanatory Construction with the Optional Controlled Pronoun “TO”. Functional Analysis of Syntactic Structures. Irkutsk: Irkutskii universitet Publ., 3–21. (In Russian).

Cheremisina, M. I., Kolosova, T. A. (1987). Essays on the theory of complex sentences. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Dictionary of the Russian language (1981). In 4 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkij jazyk Publ. (In Russian).

Efremova, T. F. (2001). The Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: Russkii iazyk Publ. (In Russian).

Grammar of the Modern Russian Literary Language (1970). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Konyushkevich, M. I. (2014). The Potential of Prepositions for the Formation of Allied Means. Juzhnoslovenskiphilolog. Kn. LXX. Beograd, 17–33.

Konyushkevich, M. I. (2022). Staples with the basic component "mezh" in Russian. Russian Grammar in the Dialogue of Scientific Schools, Directions, Methods. Vladivostok, Dal'nevostochnyi federal'nyi universitet Publ.,
210–218. (In Russian).

Krylova, O. A., Maksimov, L. Yu., Shiryaev, E. N. (1997). Modern Russian. Theoretical course. Part IV. Syntax. Punctuation. Moscow: RUDN Publ.
(In Russian).

Kryuchkov, S. B., Maksimov L. (1977). Modern Russian. Syntax of a compound sentence. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye Publ. (In Russian).

Polikarpov, A. A. (2004). Menzerrat's Law as a manifestation of basic tendencies in word formation (on the material of the chronological “morphemic and word-formation dictionary of the Russian language”). Russian Language: Historical Fates and Modernity. Moscow: MGU Publ., 287–289. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (2008). Accommodating Construction. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 9. Filologiia, 4, 58–67. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (2013). Adjectival enclosing construction // Word. Vocabulary. Word of mouth: Communication. Text. Syntax. Sankt-Peterburg, 303-308. (In Russian).

Vsevolodova M. V. (2017). The Theory of Functional and Communicative Syntax: A Fragment of the Fundamental Applied (Pedagogical) Model of Language. Moscow: URSS Publ. (In Russian).

Vsevolodova, M. V. (2000). The Theory of Functional and Communicative Syntax: A Fragment of the Applied (Pedagogical) Model of Language. Moscow: MGU Publ. (In Russian).

Vsevolodova, M. W., Kukushkina, O. W., Polikarpov, A. A. (2014). Russian prepositions and means of a prepositional type: materials for a functional-grammatical description of real use. Book 1. Introduction to objective grammar and lexicography of Russian prepositional units. Moscow: LIBROKOM Publ. (In Russian).

Vsevolodova, M. W., Vinogradova, Je. N., Chaplygina, N. Je. (2018). Russian prepositions and prepositional means. Materials for a functional-grammatical description of real use. Book 2. Register of Russian prepositional units: A – B (objective grammar). Moscow: URSS Publ.
(In Russian).

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Konyushkevich М. И. . (2023). On accommodating structures and more. Verba, (2 (7), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-2(7)-50-65