Statements with the semantics of controllability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-2(7)-78-88

Keywords:

Russian language, sentence semantics, semantic category, accountability

Abstract

This article fits into the circle of studies of semantic categories. In it, the author considers the semantic type of sentences with the semantics of accountability, which is a subcategory of controllability and is characterized by greater semantic complexity. It is noted that all sentences of this semantic type are polypropositive, regardless of the structure of the sentence. One of the propositions reflects the controlling situation, the other the controlled one. Each control situation includes the following components: subject of control + predicate + object of control. The object of control is the controlled situation with its subject and predicate. The article gives the characteristics of all components of the semantic structure, distinguishes two types of controllability: with external control and self-control. It is fixed that the distinguished two types of accountability react differently to the introduction of negation. Attention is drawn to the fact that a change or loss of at least one of the differential features of the components of the semantic structure takes the sentence beyond the boundaries of this semantic type and allows it to express related semantics on the basis of controllability/uncontrollability. This allows us to speak about the diffuseness of the semantics of controllability/uncontrollability. A set of different syntactic constructions is revealed to express the studied semantics. It is shown that the choice of construction is connected with the intention of the speaker: to present the situation under control as dominant or background. It is noted that typical linguistic markers of the semantics of controllability have been semantically “emptied” in recent years, losing their specific content or being used as euphemisms, which explains their increased (according to the National Corpus of the Russian Language) frequency of use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

T.I. Steksova , Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. in Philology, Professor
E-mail: steksova@inbox.ru

 

References

Boguslavsky, I. M., Zaliznyak, A. A. (1995). Research on the semantics of internal state predicates. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1, 195–168. (In Russian).

Bulygina, T. V. (1982). On the construction of a typology of predicates in Russian. Semanticheskiye tipy predikatov. Moscow, 7–85. (In Russian).

Van Valin R., Foley W. (1982). Referential-role grammar. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike, 11, 376–410. (In Russian).

Vezhbitska, A. (1996). Language. Culture. Cognition. Moscow. (In Russian).

Zaliznyak, A. A. (1992). Research on the semantics of internal state predicates. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner. (In Russian).

Lesonen, N. V. (2008). Statements with the semantics of forced action in modern Russian: dissertation abstract for the degree of candidate of philological sciences. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).

Steksova, T. I. (2002). Semantics of captivity in Russian: meaning, expression, functions. Novosibirsk. (In Russian).

Steksova, T. I., Shmeleva, T. V. (2021). Russian explanatory sentence as a semantic type. Sibirskiy filologicheskiy zhurnal, 3, 272–286. (In Russian).

Shatunovsky, I. B. (1996). Semantics of the sentence and non-referential words. Moscow. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (1994). Encyclopedia of semantic types of sentences. Experience of understanding the problem and systematization of facts. Sistemnyy analiz znachimykh yedinits russkogo yazyka. Smyslovyye tipy predlozheniy. P. 1. Krasnoyarsk, 4–17. (In Russian).

 

 

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Steksova Т. И. . (2023). Statements with the semantics of controllability. Verba, (2 (7), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-2(7)-78-88