The coherence of the poetic text (repetition and enjambment in the poem by V. Nabokov “I am in captivity, I am in captivity, I am in captivity!”)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-3(8)-34-46

Keywords:

text linearity, text coherence, repetition, enjambment, parcellation

Abstract

The article deals with the problems of expressiveness of a poetic text related to its linearity and coherence due to the linear arrangement of units. Defining coherence as a relationship of mutual dependence of linearly located units providing the expression of thought, the authors consider in a short poem the expressive effects produced by such phenomena as repetition and enjambment. It is shown how repetitions and enjambments emphasize the semantics expressed by words and phrases. The analyzed text of the poem gives grounds to assert that repetitions and enjambments (which, respectively, support and destroy coherence) can interact when depicting the phenomena of the artistic world: objects and states of the lyrical hero. It has been established that not a single discrepancy between metrical pauses and syntactic pauses is accidental. Such material allowed the authors to look at enjambment as a kind of parcellation: enjambment and parcellation have a common mechanism — the destruction of coherence, and a common function — the distinction of one of the elements of the "destroyed" unit. Enjambment-parcellation through metrically defined pausing controls the reader's attention, which is shifted to the accented and rhematized part — the parcel, and the position at the beginning of the line is the same means of parcellation as a period, question marks, exclamation marks and ellipsis. In the course of the analysis of repetitions and enjambments, their relation to stanzas, which are not marked with an increased interval, but are indicated by the nature of the rhyme, has been clarified. A line-by-line detailed analysis of the linearity of the poem has revealed the main details of the path from the word to the created objects of the artistic world. The results of introspection, observations of one's own reaction to a difficult form created by repetitions and enjambments, are explicated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

V. I. Zaika, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. in Philology, Associate Professor
E-mail: Vladimir.Zaika@novsu.ru

G. N. Girzheva, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation

candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor
E-mail: Galina.Girzheva@novsu.ru

 


References

Bogoyavlenskaya, Yu. V. (2018). Parcellation as a cognitivesemiotic phenomenon. Tomsk State University Journal. Philology, 55, 6–16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/55/1 (In Russian).

Butov, R. N. (2009). Enjambement as a phenomenon of rhythmics and graphics of a poetic text (On the issue of clarifying the classification). Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 3, 46–49. (In Russian).

Gasparov, M. L. (2003). Enjambment. Literaturnaya entsiklopediya terminov i ponyatiy [Literary Encyclopedia of terms and concepts]. Moscow: Intelvak Publ. (In Russian).

Gasparov, M. L. (1998). Selected articles. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ. 476. (In Russian).

Kvyatkovsky, A. (1966). Poetic dictionary: About 670 terms. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ. 375. (In Russian).

Klyuev, E. V. (2001). Rhetoric: Invention. Disposition. Elocution. Textbook for universities. Moscow: Prior Publ. 271. (In Russian).

Kopnina, G. A. (2003). Russian Russian or repetition. Kul'tura russkoy rechi. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'-spravochnik [Culture of Russian Speech: Encyclopedic dictionary-reference book]. Moscow: Flint: Nauka Publ. 476. (In Russian).

Lukin, V. A. (1999). Literary text: fundamentals of linguistic theory and elements of analysis: Textbook. Moscow: Os-89 Publ. 189. (In Russian).

Nabokov, V. (1979). Poems. Ann Arbor: Ardis Publ. 329. (In Russian).

Pekarskaya, I. V. (2017). On the existing typologies of stylistic figures (Analytical review). Vestnik Khakasskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. F. Katanova [Bulletin of the N. F. Katanov Khakass State University], 21, 83–95. (In Russian).

Shapir, M. I. (1995). "Versus" vs "prosa": Space-time of a poetic text. Philologica, 2(3/4), 7–13. (In Russian).

Stepanov, A. G. (2008). Enjambment. Poetika: slovar' aktual'nykh terminov i ponyatiy [Poetics: Dictionary of actual terms and concepts]. Moscow: Intrada Publ., 162–163. (In Russian).

Tynyanov, Yu. N. (1924). The problem of poetic language. Leningrad: Academia Publ. (In Russian).

Vannikov, Yu. V. (1998). Parcellation. Yazykoznaniye. Bol'shoy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Big Encyclopedic Dictionary. Linguistics]. Moscow: Bol'shaya Rossiyskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 369. (In Russian).

Zaika, V. I. (2006). Essays on the theory of artistic speech. Veliky Novgorod: Novgorod State University Publ. (In Russian).

Zholkovsky, A. K. (1994). Wandering dreams and other work. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Zholkovsky, A. K. (1996). Works on the poetics of expressiveness: Invariants–Theme– Techniques–Text: Collection of articles Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian).

Zubova, L. V. (2017). The poetic language of Marina Tsvetaeva. Saint Petersburg: Helikon Plus Publ. (In Russian).

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Zaika В. И. ., & Girzheva Г. Н. . (2023). The coherence of the poetic text (repetition and enjambment in the poem by V. Nabokov “I am in captivity, I am in captivity, I am in captivity!”). Verba, (3 (8), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-3(8)-34-46