Subjective-modal syntagmas in the lyrical discourse of E. A. Baratynsky

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-3(8)-47-60

Keywords:

poetic syntax, Russian romantic lyrics, introductory words, subjective modality, historical syntax of the Russian language

Abstract

The article is devoted to the semantics and functioning of introductory constructions in the poetic texts of E. A. Baratynsky. The complex syntax of Baratynsky shows that the desire for clarity and accuracy of expression, characteristic of the representatives of the “school of harmonic accuracy”, headed by V. A. Zhukovsky and K. N. Batyushkov, is not always compatible with the simplicity and clarity of the syllable: the task of embodying the “poetry of thought” required Baratynsky to complicate the poetic form at the syntactic level. Subjective-modal constructions, reflecting the conflict, the paradoxical nature of poetic consciousness, saturating the text with the intonations of a lively dialogue, were widely used in the lyrics of Baratynsky in the 1820s. The lyrical theme is often revealed by the young elegiac Baratynsky through the struggle, clash of voices, ideas, internal dispute, doubts and hesitations of the inner subject of the poem. The high activity of introductory syntagmas causes drama and "increased" dialogism, including in the form of auto-communication. Sometimes the form of conversation, dispute is in an open form. From the 1830s, the recognized author of psychological elegies turns into a "poet of thought", Baratynsky undergoes a significant creative evolution on an intensive path of saturation of a closed, "close" lyrical form with the most complex metaphysical content, when he creates the cycle of poems "Twilight" (1842). In the last lyrical cycle of Baratynsky, the activity of the introductory syntagmas is much lower than in the early elegies, the monologism of the utterance, the preaching pathos, is intensified. The complication of syntax in accordance with the desire for maximum informative saturation while saving verbal space is achieved by saturating the lyrical text not with introductory constructions, but with unattached phrases, semantically capacious, violating the smoothness of the melody and enhancing the rhythmic tension of the verse. The desire of the late Baratynsky to avoid the use of introductory constructions as a whole corresponded to the general trend towards the archaization of the syllable, the "loftiness" of expression, the strengthening of oratorical declamation, preaching pathos, characteristic of the "weaving of words" style and the biblical style.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

N. V. Patroeva, Petrozavodsk State University, Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. in Philology, Professor, Head of the Department of Russian Language of PetrSU
E-mail: nvpatr@list.ru

 

References

Anikin, A. I. (1956). Basic grammatical and semantic properties of introductory words and phrases. Russkiy yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school], 4, 22–27. (In Russian).

Anikin, A. I. (1960). Introductory combinations of words in modern Russian (formed on the basis of a name). Uchenyye zapiski MGPI [Scientific notes of the Moscow State Pedagogical Institute], 148, 242–256. (In Russian).

Baratynsky, E. A. (1989). The complete collection of poems. 3rd ed. Biblioteka poeta. Bol'shaya seriya [Poet's Library. Big series]. Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel' Publ. (In Russian).

Brang, P. (1967). Zur schpachschopferischen Leistung von E.A. Baratynskij. Festschrift fur Margarete Woltner zum 70. Geburtstag am 4.
Dezember 1967. Hrsg. von Peter Brang in Verbindung mit Herbert Bräuer und Horst Jablonowski. Heidelberg: C. Winter, 23–38. (In German).

Cherepanova, O. A. (1964). Formation of lexical and grammatical class of modal words in the Russian language of the XI–XVII centuries. Vestnik LGU. Ser. istorii, yazyka i literatury [Vestnik of Leningrad State University. Series of history, language and literature], 3(14), 126–133. (In Russian).

Ginzburg, L. (1974). About the lyrics. 2nd ed., add. Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel' Publ. (In Russian).

Ginzburg, L. (1977). About psychological prose. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya literature Publ. (In Russian).

Grigoriev V. P. (ed.). (1995). Russian Poetry History Essays of the twentieth century: Figurative Means of Poetic language and their Transformation. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Hetso, G. E. (1973). Evgeny Baratynsky: life and work. Oslo; Bergen; Universitetsforlaget Publ. (In Russian).

Holthausen, J. (1960). Zum Problem der poetischen Syntax bei Baratynski. Die Welt der Slaven. Wiesbaden. J. V. H. Hf. 3-4, 310–321. (In German).

Itskovich, V. A. (1958). On the History of introductory words and sentences in the Russian Language. Questions of Russian Linguistics, 3, 35–80.
(In Russian).

Itskovich, V. A. (1959). The history of introductory words and sentences in Russian: Materials for the course of historical syntax. Lviv: Publishing House of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. 19 p. (In Russian).

Itskovich, V. A. (1960). On the History of introductory words and sentences in the Russian Language. Questions of Russian Linguistics, 4, 91–126.
(In Russian).

Jacobson, R. O. (1975). Linguistics and poetics. Strukturalizm: «za» i «protiv» [Structuralism: "for" and "against"]: Collection of articles. Moscow: Progress Publ. 193–230. (In Russian).

Karimova, R. A. (1965). Introductory words and introductory combinations of words in the Russian literary language of the second half of the
XVIII– early XIX century. Uchenyye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific notes of Kazan State University], 125, 69–181.
(In Russian).

Kibalnik, S. A. (1990). Russian anthological poetry of the first third of
the XIX century. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 267. (In Russian).

Kovtunova, I. I. (1986). Poetic speech as a form of communication. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Questions of linguistics], 1, 3–13. (In Russian).

Kovtunova, I. I. (1986). Poetic syntax. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Kuchelbecker, V. K. (1979). About the direction of our poetry, especially lyrical, in the last decade. Journey. Diary. Articles. Leningrad: Nauka Publ. 453–459. (In Russian).

Metzler, A. A. (1987). Structural connections in the text: (Parenthetical constructions). Chisinau: Stiinza Publ. (In Russian).

Miloserdova, E. V. (1991). Semantics and pragmatics of modality: (based on the material of a simple sentence in modern German). Voronezh: Voronezh. State University Publ. (In Russian).

Patroeva, N. V. (2002). Poetic syntax: the category of complications. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University Publ. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (1980). A proposition and its representations in a sentence. Voprosy russkogo yazykoznaniya [Questions of Russian linguistics]: Collection of articles. Moscow: Moscow State University Publ.
Vol. 3, 131–137. (In Russian).

Teremova, R. M. (1985). The experience of functional description of causal constructions. Leningrad: Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute Publ.
(In Russian).

Vaulina, S. S. (1988). Evolution of means of expressing modality in the Russian language (XI-XVII centuries). Leningrad: Publishing House of LSU. (In Russian).

Vinogradov, V. V. (1986). Russian language: (Grammatical teaching about the word). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ. (In Russian).

Yakovleva, E. S. (1994). Fragments of the Russian language picture of the world: (Models of space, time and perception). Moscow: Gnosis Publ.
(In Russian).

Zubatow, Y. (1989). Zum Status der vvodnyye slova im Russischen Zeitschrift für Slavistik. Berlin. Vol. 34, Hf. 3. 420–426. (In German).

Published

2023-07-30

How to Cite

Patroeva Н. В. . (2023). Subjective-modal syntagmas in the lyrical discourse of E. A. Baratynsky. Verba, (3 (8), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2023-3(8)-47-60