Phrases-memes as source of neologisms

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2025-2(16)-35-45

Keywords:

Russian language, predicative unit, neologism

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the emergence of neologisms based on predicative units. The author revisits the issue of recognizing the capacity of a sentence to perform a nominative function – that is, to act as a sign representing a particular situation. Drawing on previously documented examples such as titles of works of art and ergonyms expressed through predicative units, as well as the documented ability of predicative units to function as various sentence members in different contexts, the author identifies and analyzes neologisms whose productive basis consists of entire sentences. The objective of this study is to determine the conditions under which such neologisms have arisen in the Russian language over the past decade and to analyze their functioning. It is argued that only sentences which have become memes can serve as a productive base. These sentences must meet specific criteria: they should be typical utterances that reflect socially significant, recurring situations; they must exhibit high frequency, reproducibility, and recognizability. From these meme phrases, nouns, adjectives, and adverbs can be derived that conform to the full range of grammatical properties of their respective parts of speech. Furthermore, the study observes that these neologisms themselves often become productive bases for subsequent word-formation processes. The neologisms under consideration exhibit a marked evaluative tone and function as markers of in-group versus out-group categories. It is also proposed that not all such neologisms will be lexicographically documented, as many are ephemeral in nature. Their usage is prompted by specific moments in time and reflects attitudes toward those moments, rendering them relevant only while the events inspiring the meme phrases remain socially pertinent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

T. I. Steksova, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. in Philology, Professor
e-mail: steksova@inbox.ru

 

References

Anikina, T. V. (2016). Internet meme in the context of modern communication. Novaya nauka: opyt, traditsii, innovatsii, 8(2), 54–58. (In Russian).

Arutyunova, N. D. (1977). Nomination and text. Language nomination. Types of nominations (pp. 304–357). Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Benveniste, E. (1974).  Problems in general linguistics. Moscow: Progress Publ. (In Russian).

Gak, V. G. (1973). Statement and situation. Problems of structural linguistics 1972: collection of articles (pp. 349–372) Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).

Gridina, T. A. (2023). Codes of language game in ergonyms of the sphere “world of childhood”: lexicographic representation. Psycholinguistic Aspects of Speech Activity Study, 21, 48–65. (In Russian).

Lappo, M. A. (2025). Active processes in word formation (based on ergonyms of Novosibirsk).  Psycholinguistic Aspects of Speech Activity Study, 23, 66‒77. (In Russian).

Mirzoeva, L. Yu. (2018). Word formation as a result of lingua-creative potential of political communication via internet network. Ural Philological Herald. Series: Language. System. Personality: Linguistics of creativity, 2, 322‒329. (In Russian).

Mirzoeva, L. Yu. (2019). Word creation in internet network and language ecology. Ecology of Language and Communicative Practice, 2(17), 26‒34. (In Russian).

Norman, B. Yu. (2004). Word and sentence, nomination and communication. Psycholinguistic Aspects of Speech Activity Study, 2, 71–87. (In Russian).

Russian language of the coronavirus era (2021): collective monograph.  St. Petersburg: Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, E. Ya. (2015). Internet communication: new trends in Russian word formation. Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin, 2, 46–52. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (2017). Communicative units on city signs. Russian Language Abroad, 5(264), 14–18. (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (2019). Polycode phenomenon of urban onomasticon. Communication Studies (Russia), 6(1), 51‒66. https://doi.org/10.25513/2413-6182.2019.6(1).51-66 (In Russian).

Shmeleva, T. V. (2020). Veliky Novgorod: onomastic portrait. Veliky Novgorod: Pechatny Dvor Publ. (In Russian).

Steksova, T. I. (2025). Identification of the nominative function of ergonyms in the linguistic consciousness of philology students. Psycholinguistic aspects of the study of speech activity, 23, 126–137. (In Russian).

Ulukhanov, I. S. (1996). Units of the word-formation system of the Russian language and their lexical implementation. Moscow: Astra Sem Publ. (In Russian).

Velikolug, L. V. (2020). Linguocultural analysis of precedent phenomena as a method of developing intercultural communicative competence. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 7(836), 231–241. (In Russian).

Vepreva, I. T. (2015). On the current lexeme Krymnash.  Russian language and literature in the space of world culture. Proceedings of the XIII Congress of MAPRYAL: in 15 vols. Vol. 2:  Modern Russian language: sociolinguistic aspects of research. (pp. 31–35). St. Petersburg: International Association of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature Publ. (In Russian).

Zhdanova, E. A., & Ratsiburskaya, L. V. (2015). Media innovations as a means of reflecting the contemporary Ukrainian reality. Philology and Culture, 2(40), 46–53. (In Russian).

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Steksova Т. И. (2025). Phrases-memes as source of neologisms. Verba, 2 (16), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.34680/VERBA-2025-2(16)-35-45